4.6 Article

Gravitational Lensing Signatures of Axion Dark Matter Minihalos in Highly Magnified Stars

期刊

ASTRONOMICAL JOURNAL
卷 159, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.3847/1538-3881/ab5e83

关键词

Cosmology; Gravitational lensing; Gravitational microlensing; Dark matter; Galaxy clusters

资金

  1. Raymond and Beverly Sackler Foundation Fund
  2. Spanish fellowship [PRX18/00444]
  3. Corning Glass Works Foundation Fellowship Fund

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Axions are a viable candidate for cold dark matter, which should generically form minihalos of subplanetary masses from white-noise isocurvature density fluctuations if the Peccei-Quinn phase transition occurs after inflation. Despite being denser than the larger halos formed out of adiabatic fluctuations from inflation, axion minihalos have surface densities much smaller than the critical value required for gravitational lensing to produce multiple images or high magnification, and hence are practically undetectable as lenses in isolation. However, their lensing effect can be enhanced when superposed near critical curves of other lenses. We propose a method to detect them through photometric monitoring of recently discovered caustic transiting stars behind cluster lenses, under extreme magnification factors mu greater than or similar to 10(3)-10(4) as the lensed stars cross microlensing caustics induced by intracluster stars. For masses of the first gravitationally collapsed minihalos in the range similar to 10(-15)-10(-8) h(-1) M, we show that axion minihalos in galaxy clusters should collectively produce subtle surface density fluctuations of amplitude similar to 10(-4)-10(-3) on projected length scales of similar to 10-10(4) au, which imprint irregularities on the microlensing lightcurves of caustic transiting stars. We estimate that, inside a cluster halo and over the age of the universe, most of these minihalos are likely to avoid dynamic disruption by encounters with stars or other minihalos.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据