4.7 Article

Protein Flexibility in Docking-Based Virtual Screening: Discovery of Novel Lymphoid-Specific Tyrosine Phosphatase Inhibitors Using Multiple Crystal Structures

期刊

JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL INFORMATION AND MODELING
卷 55, 期 9, 页码 1973-1983

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jcim.5b00344

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81373281]
  2. Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University [NCET-12-0337]
  3. Shandong Natural Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars [JQ201319]
  4. Program for Changjiang Scholars and Innovative Research Team in University, PCSIRT [IRT13028]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Incorporating protein flexibility is a major challenge for docking-based virtual screening. With an increasing number of available crystal structures, ensemble docking with multiple protein structures is an efficient approach to deal with protein flexibility. Herein, we report the successful application of a docking-based virtual screen using multiple crystal structures to discover novel inhibitors of lymphoid-specific tyrosine phosphatase (LYP), a potential drug target for autoimmune diseases. The appropriate use of multiple protein structures allowed a better enrichment than a single structure in the recovery of known inhibitors. Subsequently, an optimal ensemble of LYP structures was selected and used in docking-based virtual screening. Eight novel LYP inhibitors (IC50 ranging from 7.95 to 56.6 mu M) were identified among 23 hit compounds. Further studies demonstrated that the most active compound B15 possessed some selectivity over other protein phosphatases and could effectively up-regulate TCR (T cell receptor)-mediated signaling in Jurkat T cells. These novel hits not only provided good starting points for the development of therapeutic agents useful in autoimmune diseases but also demonstrated the advantages of choosing an appropriate ensemble of protein structures in docking-based virtual screening over using a single protein conformation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据