4.5 Article

Polymorphism of Alzheimer's Aβ17-42 (p3) Oligomers: The Importance of the Turn Location and Its Conformation

期刊

BIOPHYSICAL JOURNAL
卷 97, 期 4, 页码 1168-1177

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2009.05.042

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health [NO1-CO-12400]
  2. Intramural Research Program of the Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A beta(17-42) (so-called p3) amyloid is detected in vivo in the brains of individuals with Alzheimer's disease or Down's syndrome. We investigated the polymorphism of A beta(17-42) oligomers based on experimental data from steady-state NMR measurements, electron microscopy, two-dimensional hydrogen exchange, and mutational studies, using all-atom molecular-dynamics simulation with explicit solvent. We assessed the structural stability and the populations. Our results suggest that conformational differences in the U-turn of A beta(17-42) lead to polymorphism in beta-sheet registration and retention of an ordered beta-strand organization at the termini. Further, although the parallel A beta(17-42) oligomer organization is the most stable of the conformers investigated here, different antiparallel A beta(17-42) organizations are also stable and compete with the parallel architectures, presenting a polymorphic population. In this study we propose that 1), the U-turn conformation is the primary factor leading to polymorphism in the assembly of A beta(17-42) Oligomers, and is also coupled to oligomer growth; and 2), both parallel A beta(17-42) Oligomers and an assembly of A beta(17-42) oligomers that includes both parallel and antiparallel organizations contribute to amyloid fibril formation. Finally, since a U-turn motif generally appears in amyloids formed by full proteins or long fragments, and since to date these have been shown to exist only in parallel architectures, our results apply to a broad range of oligomers and fibrils.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据