4.0 Review

The chemical exposome of type 2 diabetes mellitus: Opportunities and challenges in the omics era

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.dsx.2019.12.001

关键词

Diabetes; Exposomics; Pollution; Heavy metal; Mass spectrometry

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is a global silent killer, with > 450 million affected adults worldwide. A diverse array of non-modifiable risk factors such as family history, age (> 45 yrs), race/ethnicity, genetics, and history of gestational diabetes and modifiable risk factors such as physical inactivity, high body fat, body weight, high blood pressure, and high cholesterol for progression of prediabetes to T2DM. Given, that the modern world human population is constantly exposed to multiple stressors in the form of physical (i.e., sound, weather etc.) and chemical environment (i.e., diet, pollutants etc.), industrialization, and modernization has led to form a basis for exposomal correlation with T2DM incidence. Over the past decade, there have been emerging reports on association of levels of persistent organic pollutants (POPs), phthalates, antibiotics, drugs, air pollution, pesticides, and heavy metals with T2DM. In this review, we discuss the well known chemical exposome that has been associated with T2DM; the tools and approaches to capture this chemical exposome, and future opportunities and challenges in this exciting area of research. We further provide a window of thoughts, whether omics technologies can help fill in the gaps to help provide high throughput exposomics datasets in an unbiased manner to help understand T2DM pathophysiology in the context of industrialization, drastic lifestyle changes, urbanization, and pollution. We also discuss and provide guidelines/call to action for future exposomics studies investigating the association of T2DM with exposomes in the context of both epidemiological and experimental approaches. (C) 2019 Diabetes India. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据