4.7 Article

Multicationic AIEgens for unimolecular photodynamic theranostics and two-photon fluorescence bioimaging

期刊

MATERIALS CHEMISTRY FRONTIERS
卷 4, 期 6, 页码 1623-1633

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d0qm00119h

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Basic Research Plan of China [2018YFA0208903]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21877042, 21702070]
  3. Postdoctoral Research Foundation of China [2017M612461]
  4. Huazhong University Startup Fund

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Photodynamic theranostics integrating synchronous photodynamic therapy and real-time monitoring of therapeutic efficacy has attracted great interest in clinical cancer management. Recently, a series of cationic molecules have been reported as self-reporting photosensitizers for unimolecular photodynamic theranostics. However, the design rationality and mechanisms for such multifunctional photosensitizers are not well understood and need further exploration. In this work, we have designed and synthesized three multicationic AIEgen photosensitizers with similar core structures, but which are end-capped with pyridinium groups (BPCI and TPCI) or quaternary ammonium groups (TPCB), respectively. The tetra-pyridinium-tethered TPCI exhibits superior efficiency in reactive oxygen species generation and dead cell identification compared to both bis-pyridinium-tethered BPCI and tetra-ammonium-tethered TPCB. The structure-activity relationship of all three AIEgens has been studied in detail, which provides great insights into designing the new generation of photosensitizers for photodynamic theranostics. Strikingly, all the multicationic AIEgens have large two-photon absorption cross-sections, and TPCI can effectively kill Caenorhabditis elegans upon white light irradiation and differentiate the dead nematodes from the living ones through the redistribution of its two-photon fluorescence, demonstrating great potential in two-photon fluorescence imaging-guided photodynamic theranostics.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据