4.6 Article

Multi-Robot Persistent Surveillance With Connectivity Constraints

期刊

IEEE ACCESS
卷 8, 期 -, 页码 15093-15109

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2967650

关键词

Mobile robots; multirobot systems; path planning; persistent surveillance; complexity analysis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Mobile robots, especially unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), are of increasing interest for surveillance and disaster response scenarios. We consider the problem of multi-robot persistent surveillance with connectivity constraints where robots have to visit sensing locations periodically and maintain a multi-hop connection to a base station. We formally define several problem instances closely related to multi-robot persistent surveillance with connectivity constraints, i.e. connectivity-constrained multi-robot persistent surveillance (CMPS), connectivity-constrained multi-robot reachability (CMR), and connectivity-constrained multi-robot reachability with relay dropping (CMRD), and show that they are all NP-hard on general graphs. We introduce three heuristics with different planning horizons for convex grid graphs and combine them with a tree traversal approach, which can be applied to a partitioning of non-convex grid graphs (CMPS with tree traversal, CMPSTT). In simulation studies we show that a short horizon greedy approach, which requires parameters to be optimized beforehand, can outperform a full horizon approach, which requires a tour through all sensing locations, if the number of robots is larger than the minimum number of robots required to reach all sensing locations. The minimum number required is the number of robots necessary for building a relay chain to the farthest sensing location from the base station. Furthermore, we show that partitioning the area and applying the tree traversal approach can achieve a similar performance to the unpartitioned case up to a certain number of robots but requires less optimization time.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据