4.6 Article

Intensity Based Spatial Soundfield Reproduction Using an Irregular Loudspeaker Array

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TASLP.2020.2987748

关键词

Loudspeakers; Harmonic analysis; Geometry; Acoustics; Decoding; Microphones; Speech processing; Sound intensity; spatial soundfield reproduction; irregular loudspeaker array; spherical harmonics; listening test

资金

  1. Australian Research Council (ARC) [DP180102375]
  2. China Scholarship Council
  3. Australian National University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Sound intensity is an acoustic quantity closely linked with human perception of sound location, and it can be controlled to create a high level of realism to humans in soundfield reproduction systems. In this article, we present an intensity matching technique to optimally reproduce sound intensity over a continuous spatial region using an irregular loudspeaker array. This avoids several known limitations in the previous works on intensity based soundfield reproduction, such as a single sweet spot for the listener and a regular loudspeaker geometry that is difficult to implement in real-world applications. In contrast to the previous works, the new technique uses a cost function we built to optimize sound intensity over space by exploiting spatial sound intensity distributions. The spatial sound intensity distribution is represented by spherical harmonic coefficients of sound pressure, which are widely used to describe a spatial soundfield. Compared to the conventional spatial soundfield reproduction method of pressure matching in the spherical harmonic domain and the HOA decoding method optimizing sound intensity at a single position, we show that the intensity matching technique has better overall performance with two different irregular loudspeaker layouts through simulations. The impact of microphone noise on reproduction performance is also assessed. Finally, we carry out perceptual localization experiments to validate the proposed method.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据