4.0 Article

Tumour necrosis factor induces increased production of extracellular amyloid-beta- and alpha-synuclein-containing aggregates by human Alzheimer's disease neurons

期刊

BRAIN COMMUNICATIONS
卷 2, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/braincomms/fcaa146

关键词

inflammation; protein aggregation; tumour necrosis factor; induced pluripotent stem cells; presenilin-1

资金

  1. Dementias Platform UK [MR/N013255/1]
  2. StemBANCC [115439]
  3. Alzheimer's Research UK [ARUK-SCRC2017-1]
  4. Wellcome Trust [101052/Z/13/Z, 105358/Z/14/Z, 203144]
  5. Cancer Research UK [C6946/A24843]
  6. European Research Council [669237]
  7. Royal Society
  8. MRC [MR/L023784/2, UKDRI-2003, MR/L023784/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In addition to increased aberrant protein aggregation, inflammation has been proposed as a key element in the pathogenesis and progression of Alzheimer's disease. How inflammation interacts with other disease pathways and how protein aggregation increases during disease are not clear. We used single-molecule imaging approaches and membrane permeabilization assays to determine the effect of chronic exposure to tumour necrosis factor, a master proinflammatory cytokine, on protein aggregation in human-induced pluripotent stem cell-derived neurons harbouring monogenic Alzheimer's disease mutations. We report that exposure of Alzheimer's disease neurons, but not control neurons, to tumour necrosis factor induces substantial production of extracellular protein aggregates. Aggregates from Alzheimer's disease neurons are composed of amyloid-beta and alpha-synuclein and induce significant permeabilization of lipid membranes in an assay of pathogenicity. These findings provide support for a causal relationship between two crucial processes in Alzheimer's disease pathogenesis and suggest that targeting inflammation, particularly tumour necrosis factor, may have beneficial downstream effects on ameliorating aberrant protein aggregation and accumulation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据