4.5 Article

Experimental Verification of the Behavioral Foundation of Bacterial Transport Parameters Using Microfluidics

期刊

BIOPHYSICAL JOURNAL
卷 95, 期 9, 页码 4481-4493

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1529/biophysj.108.134510

关键词

-

资金

  1. Schoettler Fellowship
  2. Martin Fellowship for Sustainability Research
  3. National Science Foundation [OCE-0526241]
  4. National Institutes of Health [ES002109]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We present novel microfluidic experiments to quantify population-scale transport parameters (chemotactic sensitivity chi(o) and random motility mu) of a population of bacteria. Previously, transport parameters have been derived theoretically from single-cell swimming behavior using probabilistic models, yet the mechanistic foundations of this upscaling process have not been verified experimentally. We designed a microfluidic capillary assay to generate and accurately measure gradients of chemoattractant (alpha- methylaspartate) while simultaneously capturing the swimming trajectories of individual Escherichia coli bacteria using videomicroscopy and cell tracking. By measuring swimming speed and bias in the swimming direction of single cells for a range of chemoattractant concentrations and concentration gradients, we directly computed the chemotactic velocity VC and the associated chemotactic sensitivity chi(o). We then show how m can also be readily determined using microfluidics but that a population-scale microfluidic approach is experimentally more convenient than a single-cell analysis in this case. Measured values of both chi(o) [(12.4 +/- 2.0) x 10(-4) cm(2) s(-1)] and mu[(3.3 +/- 0.8) x 10(-6) cm(2) s(-1)] are comparable to literature results. This microscale approach to bacterial chemotaxis lends experimental support to theoretical derivations of population- scale transport parameters from single-cell behavior. Furthermore, this study shows that microfluidic platforms can go beyond traditional chemotaxis assays and enable the quanti. cation of bacterial transport parameters.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据