3.8 Review

Biomarkers of Alzheimer Disease

期刊

JOURNAL OF APPLIED LABORATORY MEDICINE
卷 5, 期 1, 页码 194-208

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1373/jalm.2019.030080

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIH
  2. Alzheimer's Association
  3. BrightFocus Foundation
  4. Rainwater Foundation Tau Consortium
  5. Association for Frontotemporal Degeneration
  6. Cure Alzheimer's Foundation
  7. Tau SILK Consortium (Abbvie)
  8. Tau SILK Consortium (Biogen)
  9. Tau SILK Consortium (Eli Lilly and Co.)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Alzheimer disease (AD) was once a clinical diagnosis confirmed by postmortem autopsy. Today, with the development of AD biomarkers, laboratory assays to detect AD pathology are able to complement clinical diagnosis in symptomatic individuals with uncertain diagnosis. A variety of commercially available assays are performed as laboratory-developed tests, and many more are in development for both clinical and research purposes. Content: The role of laboratory medicine in diagnosing and managing AD is expanding; thus, it is important for laboratory professionals and ordering physicians to understand the strengths and limitations of both existing and emerging AD biomarker assays. In this review, we will provide an overview of the diagnosis of AD, discuss existing laboratory assays for AD and their recommended use, and examine the clinical performance of emerging AD biomarkers. Summary: The field of AD biomarker discovery and assay development is rapidly evolving, with recent studies promising to improve both the diagnosis of symptomatic individuals and enrollment and monitoring of asymptomatic individuals in research studies. However, care must be taken to ensure proper use and interpretation of these assays. For clinical purposes, these assays are meant to aid in diagnosis but are not themselves diagnostic. For individuals without symptoms, AD biomarker tests are still only appropriate for research purposes. Additionally, there are analytical challenges that require careful attention, especially for longitudinal use of AD tests.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据