4.5 Review

Quantifying the efficiency and selectivity of organohalide dechlorination by zerovalent iron

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE-PROCESSES & IMPACTS
卷 22, 期 3, 页码 528-542

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c9em00592g

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51308312, 51908500]
  2. U. S. National Science Foundation [EF-1266252]
  3. Center for the Environmental Implications of NanoTechnology (CEINT)
  4. Strategic Environmental Research and Development Program of the U. S. Department of Defense [ER-2308, ER-2620, ER-2621]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The efficiency and selectivity of zerovalent iron-based treatments for organohalide contaminated groundwater can be quantified by accounting for redistribution of electrons derived from oxidation of Fe-0. Several types of efficiency are reviewed, including (i) the efficiency of Fe(0) utilization, epsilon(Fe(0)), (ii) the electron efficiency of target contaminant reduction, epsilon(e), and (iii) the electron efficiency of natural reductant demand (NRD) involving H2O, O-2, and co-contaminants such as nitrate, epsilon(NRD). Selectivity can then be calculated by using epsilon(e)/epsilon(NRD). Of particular interest is epsilon(e) and the key to its determination is measuring the total quantity of electrons provided by Fe-0 oxidation, which can be based on either the loss of Fe(0), the formation of Fe(ii)/Fe(iii), or the composition of the total reaction products. Recently, many data have accumulated on epsilon(e) for the treatment of various chlorinated solvents (esp. trichloroethylene, TCE) by zerovalent iron (ZVI), and analysis of these data shows that ZVI particle properties (e.g., stabilization with polymers, bimetallic modification, sulfidation, etc.) and other operational factors have variable effects on epsilon(e). Of particular interest is that pre-exposure of ZVI to reduced sulfur species (i.e., sulfidation) consistently improves the epsilon(e) of contaminant reduction, mainly by suppressing the reduction of water.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据