4.4 Article

Partial molar volumes and adiabatic compressibilities of unfolded protein states

期刊

BIOPHYSICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 134, 期 3, 页码 185-199

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.bpc.2008.02.009

关键词

N-acetyl amino acid amides; amino acid side chains; proteins; hydration; volume; compressibility

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We determined the partial molar volumes, V degrees, and adiabatic compressibilifies, K degrees s, of N-acetyl amino acids with neutralized carboxyl termini, N-acetyl amino acid amides, and N-acetyl amino acid methylamides between 18 and 55 degrees C. The individual compounds in the three classes have been selected so as to collectively cover the 20 naturally occurring amino acid side chains. We interpret our experimental results in terms of the volumetric contributions and hydration properties of individual amino acid side chains and their constituent atomic groups. We also conducted pH-dependent densimetric and acoustic measurements to determine changes in volume and compressibility accompanying protonation of the aspartic acid, glutamic acid, histidine, lysine, and arginine side chains. We use our resulting data to develop an additive scheme for calculating the partial molar (specific) volume and adiabatic compressibility of fully extended polypeptide chains as a function of pH and temperature. We discuss the differences and similatities between our proposed scheme and the reported additive approaches. We compare our calculated volumetric characteristics of the fully extended conformations of apocytochrome c and apomyoglobin with the experimental values measured in water (for apocytochrome c) or acidic pH (for apomyoglobin). At these respective experimental conditions, the two proteins are unfolded. However, the comparison between the calculated and experimental volumetric characteristics suggests that neither apocytochrome c nor apornyoglobin are fully unfolded and retain a sizeable core of solvent-inaccessible groups. (c) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据