4.7 Article

Lactobacillus plantarum-derived extracellular vesicles induce anti-inflammatory M2 macrophage polarization in vitro

期刊

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/20013078.2020.1793514

关键词

Probiotics; Lactobacillus plantarum; extracellular vesicles; macrophage polarization; IL-10

资金

  1. Ministry of Science and ICT, Republic of Korea under the National Research Foundation (NRF) [NRF-2017R1D1A1B03033241, NRF-2018R1D1A1B07043290, NRF-2018R1A5A2025272]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Probiotics offer various health benefits.Lactobacillus plantarumhas been used for decades to enhance human intestinal mucosal immunity and improve skin barrier integrity. Extracellular vesicles (EVs) derived from eukaryotic or prokaryotic cells have been recognized as efficient carriers for delivery of biomolecules to recipient cells, and to efficiently regulate human pathophysiology. However, the mechanism underlying the beneficial effects of probiotic bacteria-derived EVs on human skin is unclear. Herein, we investigated howL. plantarum-derived EVs (LEVs) exert beneficial effects on human skin by examining the effect of LEVs on cutaneous immunity, particularly on macrophage polarization. LEVs promoted differentiation of human monocytic THP1 cells towards an anti-inflammatory M2 phenotype, especially M2b, by inducing biased expression of cell-surface markers and cytokines associated with M2 macrophages. Pre- or post-treatment with LEVs under inflammatory M1 macrophage-favouring conditions, induced by LPS and interferon-gamma, inhibited M1-associated surface marker,HLA-DR alpha expression. Moreover, LEV treatment significantly induced expression of macrophage-characteristic cytokines, IL-1 beta, GM-CSF and the representative anti-inflammatory cytokine, IL-10, in human skin organ cultures. Hence, LEVs can trigger M2 macrophage polarizationin vitro, and induce an anti-inflammatory phenomenon in the human skin, and may be a potent anti-inflammatory strategy to alleviate hyperinflammatory skin conditions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据