4.1 Article

Development of High Temperature Oxidation Resistant Iron-Based Heat Storage Materials for Rapid Carbonization and Pulverization Process of Biomass

出版社

IRON STEEL INST JAPAN KEIDANREN KAIKAN
DOI: 10.2355/tetsutohagane.TETSU-2019-123

关键词

heat storage materials; solid phase transformation; iron based alloy; high temperature oxidation; aluminizing; rotary kiln

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Utilization of the solid phase transformation heat of the iron-based alloy as well as its sensible heat was proposed as a Heat Storage Materials, HSM, for the rapid carbonization and pulverization process of biomass. Aluminizing of the HSM is a promising way to improve focused to improve its high temperature oxidation resistance. In this study, behavior of solid phase transformation and high temperature oxidation behavior, and wear and impact resistances of the oxide layer are examined for Fe-Mn-C alloy as a candidate of HSM. Latent heats and transformation temperatures were evaluated using a DSC. Mass change ratio of the samples were measured using a TG. Then, DSC measurements were carried out with the oxidized samples. Spherical segment samples were charged into lab-scale rotary kiln type furnace to evaluate wear and impact resistance of oxide layer formed during high temperature oxidation. Endo- and exo-thermic heats of Fe-2%Mn-0.7%C showed similar with Fe-0.77%C alloy. Endo- and exo-thermic temperatures deceased with increase in Mn concentration. Fe-Mn-C alloy did not show sufficient oxidation resistance at high temperature, whereas the aluminized sample 5 showed a superior oxidation resistance due 4.5 to the formation of continuous Al2O3 layer. Thinner Al(2)O(3 )layer is formed on the alloy sample by the aluminizing with lower Al concentration and shorter time and its latent 3 heat become larger. The Al2O3 layer of the 2.5 aluminized and oxidized samples were not s 2 peeled and significant weight change did not 1.5 also occur after the experiment using the rotary kiln type furnace.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据