期刊
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT
卷 36, 期 2, 页码 289-295出版社
HOGREFE & HUBER PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1027/1015-5759/a000516
关键词
cross-rater agreement; informants; peer-ratings; measurement invariance; equivalence
资金
- University of Tartu [SP1GVARENG]
- Estonian Ministry of Education and Ministry of Education and Science [IUT2-13]
Personality researchers often supplement or substitute self-reports with ratings from knowledgeable informants, at least implicitly assuming that the same constructs are being measured regardless of the source of ratings. However, measurement invariance (MI) of personality constructs across these rating types has rarely been empirically tested. Here, this was done for the Five-Factor Model domains and their 30 facets (N = 3,253). All facets and all domains but Agreeableness met the level of invariance (metric MI) required for comparing the relative standings of individuals across self-reports and informant-ratings, which is what researchers mostly do. However, ten facets and the Agreeableness domain failed to achieve the level of invariance (scalar MI) recommended when comparing mean scores. In conclusion, self-reports and informant-ratings appear to measure similar constructs for most research purposes.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据