4.1 Article

Do Self-Reports and Informant-Ratings Measure the Same Personality Constructs?

期刊

出版社

HOGREFE & HUBER PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1027/1015-5759/a000516

关键词

cross-rater agreement; informants; peer-ratings; measurement invariance; equivalence

资金

  1. University of Tartu [SP1GVARENG]
  2. Estonian Ministry of Education and Ministry of Education and Science [IUT2-13]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Personality researchers often supplement or substitute self-reports with ratings from knowledgeable informants, at least implicitly assuming that the same constructs are being measured regardless of the source of ratings. However, measurement invariance (MI) of personality constructs across these rating types has rarely been empirically tested. Here, this was done for the Five-Factor Model domains and their 30 facets (N = 3,253). All facets and all domains but Agreeableness met the level of invariance (metric MI) required for comparing the relative standings of individuals across self-reports and informant-ratings, which is what researchers mostly do. However, ten facets and the Agreeableness domain failed to achieve the level of invariance (scalar MI) recommended when comparing mean scores. In conclusion, self-reports and informant-ratings appear to measure similar constructs for most research purposes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据