4.5 Article

New C4-and C1-derivatives of furo[3,4-c] pyridine-3-ones and related compounds: Evidence for site-specific inhibition of the constitutive proteasome and its immunoisoform

期刊

BIOORGANIC & MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY LETTERS
卷 24, 期 6, 页码 1571-1580

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2014.01.072

关键词

Furo[3,4-c] pyridine-3-ones; Furo-and thieno[2,3-d] pyrimidine-4-ones; CT-L; T-L and PA proteolytic activities; Constitutive c20S proteasome; Immunoproteasome i20S; In silico docking

资金

  1. Yerevan University
  2. State Committee Science MES RA [SCS 131D330]
  3. Vietnamian Ministery for Education
  4. Pierre et Marie Curie University (UPMC, Paris)
  5. French Association against myopathies

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A set of 18 new C-4 and C-1 derivatives of nor-cerpegin (1,1-dimethyl furo[3,4-c] pyridine-3-one), 6 model compounds (gamma- and delta-lactones) and 20 furo-or thieno[2,3-d]-pyrimidine-4-one related compounds were designed and synthesized. Each compound was assayed for inhibition of CT-L, T-L and PA proteolytic activities of 20S constitutive proteasome (c20S). Most performant compounds were also assayed on 20S immunoproteasome (i20S). Compound 10 with a benzylamino group at C-4 and dimethylated at C-1 of the furopyridine ring was the most efficient PA site-specific inhibitor of the c20S (IC50cPA of 600 nM) without noticeable inhibition of the i20S PA site (iPA). In silico docking assays for 10 at the iPA catalytic site revealed the absence of poses normally observed for this compound and related ones at the constitutive PA site (cPA). The thieno[2,3-d] pyrimidine-4-one 40 was T-L site-specific with a mild inhibition of both c20S and i20S in vitro (IC50T-L of 9.9 lM and IC50T-L of 6.7 mu M). In silico docking assays of 40 at T-L sites of c20S and i20S revealed almost identical first rank poses in the two types of sites with no possibility left for nucleophilic attack by Thr1 as observed for the fused furopyridine-3-one 10. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据