4.5 Article

Can avian functional traits predict cultural ecosystem services?

期刊

PEOPLE AND NATURE
卷 2, 期 1, 页码 138-151

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/pan3.10058

关键词

avian conservation; conservation psychology; ecosystem services; human-nature interactions; Neotropical birds; questionnaire surveys

资金

  1. Natural Environment Research Council [NE/I028068/1]
  2. U.S. Forest Service [16-IJ-11242309-057]
  3. Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
  4. National Geographic Young Explorers [C335-16]
  5. Graduate Global Leadership Doctoral Fellowship
  6. Killam Doctoral Fellowship
  7. NERC [NE/I028068/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The functional trait diversity of species assemblages can predict the provision of ecosystem services such as pollination and carbon sequestration, but it is unclear whether the same trait-based framework can be applied to identify the factors that underpin cultural ecosystem services and disservices. To explore the relationship between traits and the contribution of species to cultural ecosystem services and disservices, we conducted 404 questionnaire surveys with birdwatchers and local residents in Guanacaste, Costa Rica. We used an information-theoretic approach to identify which of 20 functional traits for 199 Costa Rican bird species best predicted their cultural ecosystem service scores related to birdwatching, acoustic aesthetics, education and local identity, as well as disservices (e.g. harm to crops). We found that diet was the most important variable explaining perceptions of cultural ecosystem service and disservice providers. Aesthetic traits such as plumage colour and pattern were important in explaining birdwatching scores. We also found people have a high affinity for forest-affiliated birds. The insight that functional traits can explain variation among cultural perspectives on values derived from birds offers a first step towards a trait-based system for understanding the species attributes that underpin cultural ecosystem services and disservices.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据