4.2 Article

Comprehensive Investigations of the Cl

期刊

CCS CHEMISTRY
卷 2, 期 5, 页码 882-894

出版社

CHINESE CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.31635/ccschem.020.202000195

关键词

potential energy surface; transition state; multichannel reaction; mode specificity; mechanism; reaction dynamics; kinetics

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21973009, 21573027]
  2. US Department of Energy [DE-SC0015997]
  3. Chongqing Municipal Natural Science Foundation [cstc2019jcyjmsxmX0087]
  4. Alexander von Humboldt Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cl+CH3OH -> HCl+CH3O/CH2OH is a prototypical multiple-channel reaction. Experimentally, ample dynamical and kinetic information is available, but there are still many uncertainties concerning the reaction mechanism. Theoretical investigations are rare due to the absence of a potential energy surface (PES), which has greatly hindered our understanding of the reaction dynamics. Using a machine-learning approach, an accurate full-dimensional PES for the title reaction based on tens of thousands of high-level ab initio data is reported. Comprehensive dynamical calculations were performed on the PES using quasi-classical trajectories, and the results provide insights into the reaction kinetics and dynamics. The calculated non-Arrhenius rate coefficients are consistent with the experimental data, attributable to a complex-forming mechanism at low temperatures. At high energies, the reaction is dominated by a direct mechanism, which results in dominant forward scattering via a stripping mechanism augmented by less prominent sideways and backward scattering via a rebound mechanism. At collision energies of 5.6 and 8.7 kcal/mol, the measured product translational energy and ro-vibrational state distributions of HCl are well reproduced. In addition, mode specificity is revealed and rationalized by the sudden vector projection model. This work sheds valuable light on the microscopic mechanism and dynamics of this prototypical multichannel reaction.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据