4.4 Review

Breeding buckwheat for nutritional quality

期刊

BREEDING SCIENCE
卷 70, 期 1, 页码 67-73

出版社

JAPANESE SOC BREEDING
DOI: 10.1270/jsbbs.19016

关键词

flavonoids; low-amy lose; quercetin; recessive genes; rutin; waxy starch

资金

  1. Slovenian Research Agency [P1-0143, P1-0212, P3-0395, L4-9305]
  2. Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Food, Republic of Slovenia
  3. applied research project Optimisation of barley and buckwheat processing for sustainable use in high quality functional foods [L4-7552]
  4. Slovenian Research Agency
  5. Valens Int d.o.o.
  6. EUFORINNO 7th FP EU Infrastructure Program [315982]
  7. National Key R&D program of China [2017YFE0117600]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Common buckwheat (Fagopyrum esculentum Moench, CB) and Tartary buckwheat (Fagopyrum tataricum (L.) Gaertn., TB) are used in human nutrition. The idea to screen in the haploid phase for genes affecting low amylose concentration opens the possibility for the effective search of low amylose (waxy) genotypes in CB populations. Self-pollinated homozygous plants of TB might allow us to use a part of endosperm for screening of amylose content. Phenolic substances have a significant inhibitory effect on the digestion of CB and TB proteins, thus metabolites may have impact on protein digestibility. Digestion-resistant peptides are largely responsible for the bile acid elimination. Breeding to diminish polyphenols and anti-nutritional substances might have negative effects on the resistance of plants against pests, diseases and UV-radiation. Bread and pasta are popular CB and TB dishes. During dough making most of CB or TB rutin is degraded to quercetin by rutin-degrading enzymes. The new trace-rutinosidase TB variety makes possible making TB bread with considerable amount of rutin, preserving the initial rutin from flour. Breeding CB and TB for larger embryos would make it possible to increase protein, rutin, and essential minerals concentration in CB and TB grain.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据