4.7 Article

Mortality after drug-eluting stents vs. coronary artery bypass grafting for left main coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

期刊

EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL
卷 41, 期 34, 页码 3228-3235

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa135

关键词

Left main stem; PCI; CABG

资金

  1. National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Biomedical Research Centre based at Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust
  2. Imperial College London
  3. Medical Research Council [MR/M018369/1]
  4. Wellcome Trust [212183/Z/18/Z]
  5. British Heart Foundation [FS 04/079]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aims The optimal method of revascularization for patients with left main coronary artery disease (LMCAD) is controver- sial. Coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) has traditionally been considered the gold standard therapy, and recent randomized trials comparing CABG with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with drug-eluting stents (DES) have reported conflicting outcomes. We, therefore, performed a systematic review and updated meta-analysis comparing CABG to PCI with DES for the treatment of LMCAD. Methods and results We systematically identified all randomized trials comparing PCI with DES vs. CABG in patients with LMCAD. The primary efficacy endpoint was all-cause mortality. Secondary endpoints included cardiac death, myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, and unplanned revascularization. All analyses were by intention-to-treat. There were five eligible trials in which 4612 patients were randomized. The weighted mean follow-up duration was 67.1 months. There were no significant differences between PCI and CABG for the risk of all-cause mortality [relative risk (RR) 1.03, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.81-1.32; P=0.779] or cardiac death (RR 1.03, 95% CI 0.79-1.34; P= 0.817). There were also no significant differences in the risk of stroke (RR 0.74, 95% CI 0.35-1.50; P=0.400) or MI (RR 1.22, 95% CI 0.96-1.56; P=0.110). Percutaneous coronary intervention was associated with an increased risk of unplanned revascularization (RR 1.73, 95% CI 1.49-2.02; P< 0.001). Conclusion The totality of randomized clinical trial evidence demonstrated similar long-term mortality after PCI with DES compared with CABG in patients with LMCAD. Nor were there significant differences in cardiac death, stroke, or MI between PCI and CABG. Unplanned revascularization procedures were less common after CABG compared with PCI. These findings may inform clinical decision-making between cardiologists, surgeons, and patients with LMCAD.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据