4.1 Article

Influence of combination forms of intact sub-layer and tectonically deformed sub-layer of coal on the gas drainage performance of boreholes: a numerical study

期刊

出版社

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1007/s40789-020-00317-0

关键词

Tectonically deformed coal; Pressure decay; Permeability; Hydraulic flushing boreholes

资金

  1. National Science Foundation of China [51904311, 51874314]
  2. Beijing Municipal Natural Science Foundation [8194072]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2019QY02]
  4. State Key Laboratory Cultivation Base for Gas Geology and Gas Control (Henan Polytechnic University) [WS2019A04]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

High concentration and large flow flux of gas drainage from underground coal seams is the precondition of reducing emission and large-scale use of gas. However, the layered occurrence of coal seams with tectonically deformed sub-layers and intact sub-layers makes it difficult to effectively drain gas through commonly designed boreholes. In this study, the gas drainage performance in coal seams with different combinations of tectonically deformed sub-layers and intact sub-layers was numerically analyzed. The analysis results show that the gas drainage curve changes from a single-stage line to a dual-stage curve as the permeability ratios of Zone II (k(II)) and Zone I (k(I)) increase, raising the difficulty in gas drainage. Furthermore, a dual-system pressure decay model based on the first-order kinetic model was developed to describe the dual-stage characteristics of pressure decay curves with different permeability ratios. In the end, the simulation results were verified with reference to in-situ drainage data from literature. The research results are helpful for mines, especially those with layered coal seams comprising tectonically deformed sub-layers and intact sub-layers, to choose appropriate gas drainage methods and develop the original drainage designs for achieving better gas drainage performance.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据