4.0 Article

Evaluation of urban underground space resources using a negative list method: Taking Xi'an City as an example in China

期刊

CHINA GEOLOGY
卷 3, 期 1, 页码 124-136

出版社

CHINA GEOLOGY EDITORIAL OFFICE
DOI: 10.31035/cg2020006

关键词

Urban geology; Negative list; Natural resources for underground space; Exploitable resources for underground space; 3D geological structure model; GIS platform; Urban geological survey engineering; Xi'an City; Shaanxi Province; China

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Project, Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China [2018YFC1504700]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Utilization of urban underground space has become a vital approach to alleviate the strain on urban land resources, and to optimize the structure and pattern of the city. It is also very important to improve the city environment, build livable city and increase the capacity of the city. Based on the analysis of existing evaluation methods and their problems, a method for evaluating underground space resources based on a negative list of adverse factors affecting underground space development is proposed, to be primarily used in urban planning stages. A list of the adverse factors is established, including limiting factors, constraining factors and influencing factors. Taking Xi 'an as an example, using a geographical information system platform, a negative list of adverse factors for the underground space resources in Xi' an City are evaluated, and preventive measures are proposed. Natural resources, exploitable resources, and the potential growth of exploitable underground space resources are evaluated. Underground space assessment in the different development stages of the city, collaborative utilization and safety evaluation for multiple subsurface resources, environmental impact and assessment, as well as evaluation methods based on big data and intelligent optimization algorithms are all discussed with the aim of serving city planning and construction. (c) 2020 China Geology Editorial Office.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据