3.9 Article

On the Systemic Features of Urban Systems. A Look at Material Flows and Cultural Dimensions to Address Post-Growth Resilience and Sustainability

期刊

FRONTIERS IN SUSTAINABLE CITIES
卷 2, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/frsc.2020.00012

关键词

material and immaterial drivers; post-growth; resilience and sustainability; urban metabolism; systems thinking; urban ecology; sustainable planning and design; cities

资金

  1. Sino-Italian Cooperation of Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [71861137001]
  2. International Cooperation, Direzione Generale per la Promozione del Sistema Paese (MAECI, High Relevance Bilateral Projects) [PGR05278]
  3. Beijing Science and Technology Planning Project [Z181100005318001]
  4. National Natural Science Foundation [71673029]
  5. 111 Project [B17005]
  6. Italian Ministry of Foreign Affairs

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Urbanization is widely recognized as a relentless trend at the global level. Nevertheless, a comprehensive assessment of urban systems able to address the future growth and decline of cities is still lacking. Urban systems today rely on abundant resources, flowing in from other regions, and their future availability and accessibility should be taken into consideration to ensure urban well-being and resilience in likely post-growth scenarios. A logical framework to address the challenge of urban planning and management to promote long-term urban system sustainability is proposed. Systems thinking and diagramming are applied, while comprehensively tracking the key material flows upon which cities depend back to their sources. First, the nexus among resources and urban activities is identified, and then its circularity is framed within a wider discourse on urban sustainability and resilience. Discussion is carried out within a two-fold perspective of both existing and newly built environments, while related economies are analyzed in order to find possible game-changing scenarios.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.9
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据