4.2 Article

Automated Myocardial T2 and Extracellular Volume Quantification in Cardiac MRI Using Transfer Learning-based Myocardium Segmentation

期刊

出版社

RADIOLOGICAL SOC NORTH AMERICA (RSNA)
DOI: 10.1148/ryai.2019190034

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [R01HL129185, R01HL129157]
  2. American Heart Association [15EIA22710040]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61771463, 81971611]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: To assess the performance of an automated myocardial T2 and extracellular volume (ECV) quantification method using transfer learning of a fully convolutional neural network (CNN) pretrained to segment the myocardium on T1 mapping images. Materials and Methods: A single CNN previously trained and tested using 11 550 manually segmented native T1-weighted images was used to segment the myocardium for automated myocardial T2 and ECV quantification. Reference measurements from 1525 manually processed T2 maps and 1525 ECV maps (from 305 patients) were used to evaluate the performance of the pretrained network. Correlation coefficient (R) and Bland-Altman analysis were used to assess agreement between automated and reference values on per-patient, per-slice, and per-segment analyses. Furthermore, transfer learning effectiveness in the CNN was evaluated by comparing its performance to four CNNs trained using manually segmented T2-weighted and postcontrast T1-weighted images and initialized using random-weights or weights of the pretrained CNN. Results: T2 and ECV measurements using the pretrained CNN strongly correlated with reference values in per-patient (T2: R = 0.88, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.85, 0.91; ECV: R = 0.91, 95% CI: 0.89, 0.93), per-slice (T2: R = 0.83, 95% CI: 0.81, 0.85; ECV: R = 0.84, 95% CI: 0.82, 0.86), and per-segment (T2: R = 0.75, 95% CI: 0.74, 0.77; ECV: R = 0.76, 95% CI: 0.75, 0.77) analyses. In Bland-Altman analysis, the automatic and reference values were in good agreement in per-patient (T2: 0.3 msec +/- 2.9; ECV: -0.3% +/- 1.7), per-slice (T2: 0.1 msec +/- 4.6; ECV: -0.3% +/- 2.5), and per-segment (T2: 0.0 msec +/- 6.5; ECV: -0.4% +/- 3.5) analyses. The performance of the pretrained network was comparable to networks refined or trained from scratch using additional manually segmented images. Conclusion: Transfer learning extends the utility of pretrained CNN-based automated native T1 mapping analysis to T2 and ECV mapping without compromising performance. (c) RSNA, 2020

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据