4.8 Article

Enzymatic outside-in cross-linking enables single-step microcapsule production for high-throughput three-dimensional cell microaggregate formation

期刊

MATERIALS TODAY BIO
卷 6, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.mtbio.2020.100047

关键词

Cell encapsulation; Droplet microfluidics; Enzymatic cross-linking; Hydrogel; Hollow microgel; Cell spheroid

资金

  1. Innovative Research Incentives Scheme Vidi from the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO) [17522]
  2. European Research Council (ERC) [759425]
  3. Dutch Arthritis Foundation [17-1-405]
  4. Iran National Science Foundation: INSF [95827599]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cell-laden hydrogel microcapsules enable the high-throughput production of cell aggregates, which are relevant for three-dimensional tissue engineering and drug screening applications. However, current microcapsule production strategies are limited by their throughput, multistep protocols, and limited amount of compatible biomaterials. We here present a single-step process for the controlled microfluidic production of single-core microcapsules using enzymatic outside-in cross-linking of tyramine-conjugated polymers. It was hypothesized that a physically, instead of the conventionally explored biochemically, controlled enzymatic cross-linking process would improve the reproducibility, operational window, and throughput of shell formation. Droplets were flown through a silicone delay line, which allowed for highly controlled diffusion of the enzymatic cross-linking initiator. The microcapsules' cross-linking density and shell thickness is strictly depended on the droplet's retention time in the delay line, which is predictably controlled by flow rate. The here presented hydrogel cross-linking method allows for facile and cytocompatible production of cell-laden microcapsules compatible with the formation and biorthogonal isolation of long-term viable cellular spheroids for tissue engineering and drug screening applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据