3.9 Article

BCOR Binding to MLL-AF9 Is Essential for Leukemia via Altered EYA1, SIX, and MYC Activity

期刊

BLOOD CANCER DISCOVERY
卷 1, 期 2, 页码 162-177

出版社

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/2643-3230.BCD-20-0036

关键词

-

资金

  1. NCI [R01 CA155328, R01 CA233749]
  2. ASH Bridge Grant
  3. NIH [S10RR023035, P41GM103399]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

MLL is a target of chromosomal translocations in acute leukemias with poor prognosis. The common MLL fusion partner AF9 (MLLT3) can directly bind to AF4, DOT1L, BCOR, and CBX8. To delineate the relevance of BCOR and CBX8 binding to MLL-AF9 for leukemogenesis, here we determine protein structures of AF9 complexes with CBX8 and BCOR, and show that binding of all four partners to AF9 is mutually exclusive. Using the structural analyses, we identify point mutations that selectively disrupt AF9 interactions with BCOR and CBX8. In bone marrow stem/ progenitor cells expressing point mutant CBX8 or point mutant MLL-AF9, we show that disruption of direct CBX8/MLL-AF9 binding does not impact in vitro cell proliferation, whereas loss of direct BCOR/MLL-AF9 binding causes partial differentiation and increased proliferation. Strikingly, loss of MLL-AF9/BCOR binding abrogated its leukemogenic potential in a mouse model. The MLL-AF9 mutant deficient for BCOR binding reduces the expression of the EYA1 phosphatase and the protein level of c-Myc. Reduction in BCOR binding to MLL-AF9 alters a MYC-driven gene expression program, as well as altering expression of SIX-regulated genes, likely contributing to the observed reduction in the leukemia-initiating cell population. SIGNIFICANCE: Direct recruitment of BCOR to MLL-AF9 is essential for leukemia via EYA1 phosphatase regulation, altering MYC and SIX gene expression programs. Specific partner binding (AF4, DOT1L, and BCOR) contributes in distinct ways to MLL leukemia. This may provide a rationale for combination DOT1L and EYA1 inhibition for MLL fusion leukemia treatment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.9
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据