4.7 Article

REQUIEM-2D Methodology: Spatially Resolved Stellar Populations of Massive Lensed Quiescent Galaxies from Hubble Space Telescope 2D Grism Spectroscopy

期刊

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
卷 900, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/abac62

关键词

-

资金

  1. NASA [NAS 5-26555, 80NSSC19K1418, HST-GO-14622, HST-GO-15663]
  2. Alfred P. Sloan Foundation
  3. ERC Consolidator Grant funding scheme (project ConTExt) [648179]
  4. Danish National Research Foundation [140]
  5. National Science Foundation Astronomy and Astrophysics Fellowship [AST-1701546]
  6. David Dunlap family
  7. University of Toronto

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We present a novel Bayesian methodology to jointly model photometry and deep Hubble Space Telescope 2D grism spectroscopy of high-redshift galaxies. Our requiem2d code measures both unresolved and resolved stellar populations, ages, and star formation histories (SFHs) for the ongoing REsolving QUIEscent Magnified (REQUIEM) Galaxies Survey, which targets strong gravitationally lensed quiescent galaxies a z similar to 2. We test the accuracy of requiem2d using a simulated sample of massive galaxies at z similar to 2 from the Illustris cosmological simulation and find that we recover the general trends in SFH and median stellar ages. We further present a pilot study for the REQUIEM Galaxies Survey: MRG-S0851, a quintuply imaged, massive (logM/M-circle dot = 11.02 +/- 0.04) red galaxy at z = 1.883.+/-.0.001. With an estimated gravitational magnification of mu = 5.7(-0.2)(+0.4), we sample the stellar populations on 0.6 kpc physical size bins. The global mass-weighted median age is constrained to be 1.8(-0.2)(+0.3) Gyr, and our spatially resolved analysis reveals that MRG-S0851 has a flat age gradient in the inner 3 kpc core after taking into account the subtle effects of dust and metallicity on age measurements, favoring an early formation scenario. The analysis for the full REQUIEM-2D sample will be presented in a forthcoming paper with a beta release of the requiem2d code.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据