4.6 Article

Brain barrier properties and cerebral blood flow in neonatal mice exposed to cerebral hypoxia-ischemia

期刊

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1038/jcbfm.2014.255

关键词

blood-brain barrier; brain injury; cerebral blood flow; hypoxia-ischemia; neonate; tight-junction

资金

  1. Swedish Medical Research Council [VR 2009-2630, VR 2012-2992, VR 2012-3500]
  2. European Union [HEALTH-F2-2009-241778]
  3. Leducq Foundation [DSRR_P34404]
  4. Wellcome Trust [WT094823MA]
  5. Ahlen-stiftelsen
  6. Olle Engkvist Foundation
  7. Wilhelm and Martina Lundgren Foundation
  8. Magnus Bergwall Foundation
  9. Ake Wiberg Foundation
  10. [ALFGBG-142881]
  11. [ALFGBG-426401]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Insults to the developing brain often result in irreparable damage resulting in long-term deficits in motor and cognitive functions. The only treatment today for hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (HIE) in newborns is hypothermia, which has limited clinical benefit. We have studied changes to the blood-brain barriers (BBB) as well as regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) in a neonatal model of HIE to further understand the underlying pathologic mechanisms. Nine-day old mice pups, brain roughly equivalent to the near-term human fetus, were subjected to hypoxia-ischemia. Hypoxia-ischemia increased BBB permeability to small and large molecules within hours after the insult, which normalized in the following days. The opening of the BBB was associated with changes to BBB protein expression whereas gene transcript levels were increased showing direct molecular damage to the BBB but also suggesting compensatory mechanisms. Brain pathology was closely related to reductions in rCBF during the hypoxia as well as the areas with compromised BBB showing that these are intimately linked. The transient opening of the BBB after the insult is likely to contribute to the pathology but at the same time provides an opportunity for therapeutics to better reach the infarcted areas in the brain.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据