4.6 Article

Angiotensin-(1-7) protects against the development of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage in mice

期刊

JOURNAL OF CEREBRAL BLOOD FLOW AND METABOLISM
卷 35, 期 7, 页码 1163-1168

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1038/jcbfm.2015.30

关键词

inflammation; Intracranial aneurysm; stroke; subarachnoid hemorrhage

资金

  1. National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NIH/NINDS) [R01NS055876, R01NS082280]
  2. Brain Aneurysm Foundation Shirley Dudek Demmer Chair of Research
  3. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [15K10306, 15H04950] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Angiotensin-(1-7) (Ang-(1-7)) can regulate vascular inflammation and remodeling, which are processes that have important roles in the pathophysiology of intracranial aneurysms. In this study, we assessed the effects of Ang-(1-7) in the development of intracranial aneurysm rupture using a mouse model of intracranial aneurysms in which aneurysmal rupture (i.e., aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage) occurs spontaneously and causes neurologic symptoms. Treatment with Ang-(1-7) (0.5 mg/kg/day), Mas receptor antagonist (A779 0.5 mg/kg/day or 2.5 mg/kg/day), or angiotensin II type 2 receptor (AT2R) antagonist (PD 123319, 10 mg/kg/day) was started 6 days after aneurysm induction and continued for 2 weeks. Angiotensin-(1-7) significantly reduced the rupture rate of intracranial aneurysms without affecting the overall incidence of aneurysms. The protective effect of Ang-(1-7) was blocked by the AT2R antagonist, but not by the Mas receptor antagonist. In AT2R knockout mice, the protective effect of Ang-(1-7) was absent. While AT2R mRNA was abundantly expressed in the cerebral arteries and aneurysms, Mas receptor mRNA expression was very scarce in these tissues. Angiotensin-(1-7) reduced the expression of tumor necrosis factor-a and interleukin-1 beta in cerebral arteries. These findings indicate that Ang-(1-7) can protect against the development of aneurysmal rupture in an AT2R-dependent manner.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据