4.6 Article

Progression of MRI markers in cerebral small vessel disease: Sample size considerations for clinical trials

期刊

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1038/jcbfm.2015.113

关键词

Cerebral small vessel disease; clinical trials; diffusion tensor imaging; magnetic resonance imaging; vascular cognitive impairment

资金

  1. Wellcome Trust [081589]
  2. English National Institute of Health Research (NIHR) Clinical Stroke Research Network
  3. NIHR
  4. Cambridge University Hospital Comprehensive NIHR Biomedical Research Unit
  5. Alzheimer's Research UK [ARUK-PG2013-2]
  6. Academy of Medical Sciences (AMS) [AMS-SGCL8-Lambert] Funding Source: researchfish
  7. Alzheimers Research UK [ARUK-PG2013-2] Funding Source: researchfish
  8. National Institute for Health Research [NF-SI-0512-10019, CL-2012-16-501] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Detecting treatment efficacy using cognitive change in trials of cerebral small vessel disease (SVD) has been challenging, making the use of surrogate markers such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) attractive. We determined the sensitivity of MRI to change in SVD and used this information to calculate sample size estimates for a clinical trial. Data from the prospective SCANS (St George's Cognition and Neuroimaging in Stroke) study of patients with symptomatic lacunar stroke and confluent leukoaraiosis was used (n=121). Ninety-nine subjects returned at one or more time points. Multimodal MRI and neuropsychologic testing was performed annually over 3 years. We evaluated the change in brain volume, T2 white matter hyperintensity (WMH) volume, lacunes, and white matter damage on diffusion tensor imaging (DTI). Over 3 years, change was detectable in all MRI markers but not in cognitive measures. WMH volume and DTI parameters were most sensitive to change and therefore had the smallest sample size estimates. MRI markers, particularly WMH volume and DTI parameters, are more sensitive to SVD progression over short time periods than cognition. These markers could significantly reduce the size of trials to screen treatments for efficacy in SVD, although further validation from longitudinal and intervention studies is required.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据