4.5 Article

Phenolic compounds profile in sorghum processed by extrusion cooking and dry heat in a conventional oven

期刊

JOURNAL OF CEREAL SCIENCE
卷 65, 期 -, 页码 220-226

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcs.2015.06.015

关键词

Flavonoids; Proanthocyanidins; Antioxidant profile; Sorghum processing

资金

  1. Embrapa - Maize and Sorghum (Brazil)
  2. Foundation for Research Support of Minas Gerais (FAPEMIG, Brazil)
  3. Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES, Brazil)
  4. National Counsel of Technological and Scientific Development (CNPq, Brazil)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L) is a gluten-free cereal that has the highest content of phenolic compounds among cereals. It needs to be processed prior to use for human consumption, which may change its antioxidant profile. The knowledge on the effects of extrusion and dry heat in a conventional oven on flavones, flavanones, and proanthocyanidins is limited. Thus, the content and stability to dry heat in a conventional oven (DHCO) and extrusion cooking on phenolic compounds profile in sorghum genotypes were evaluated. Flavanones and flavones decreased after extrusion cooking (100%) and DHCO (31.7 -61.6%). The 3-deoxyanthocyanidins were stable in DHCO but were susceptible to extrusion cooking (70.7-93.9%). Proanthocyanidins were identified only in the genotype SC391 and were reduced after both treatments (DHCO: 39.2% and extrusion cooking: 52.1%). Phenols decreased in the genotype SC319 submitted to DHCO (8.3%) and in all extruded genotypes (13.6-14.9%). The DHCO increased the antioxidant capacity in all genotypes, whereas extrusion cooking reduced antioxidant capacity in only two genotypes. In general, differential stability of the major flavonoids in sorghum was observed under DHCO and extrusion cooking, implying that different processing techniques can be selected to minimize losses of bioactive polyphenols in sorghum depending on the flavonoid composition. (C) 2015 Published by Elsevier Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据