4.5 Review

Do ancient wheat species differ from modern bread wheat in their contents of bioactive components?

期刊

JOURNAL OF CEREAL SCIENCE
卷 65, 期 -, 页码 236-243

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcs.2015.07.014

关键词

Wheat; Health benefits; Dietary fibre; Phytochemicals

资金

  1. CGIAR
  2. CGIAR WHEAT programme [A403 1.09.47]
  3. Biotechnological and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC)
  4. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BBS/E/C/00005206] Funding Source: researchfish
  5. BBSRC [BBS/E/C/00005206] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ancient wheat species (einkorn, emmer, spelt and Khorasan wheat) have been suggested to have health benefits when compared with modern cultivars of bread and durum wheat. Although limited data are available on the contents and compositions of bioactive components in ancient wheat species, reported studies show that they differ little from modern wheat species in the contents of most bioactive components, and may be lower in some components (such as dietary fibre). Although einkorn, emmer and Khorasan wheat all have higher high contents of the carotenoid lutein than bread wheat, durum wheat is also rich in lutein due to selection for yellow colour. These reported analyses do not support the suggestion that ancient wheats are generally more healthy than modern wheats. (C) 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据