4.6 Article

Dual-potential electrochemiluminescence from black phosphorus and graphitic carbon nitrides for label-free enzymatic biosensing

期刊

ANALYST
卷 146, 期 20, 页码 6281-6287

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d1an01366a

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21575002]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Simultaneous anodic and cathodic electrochemiluminescence emissions were achieved using black phosphorus nanosheets and graphitic carbon nitrides as emitters, leading to the development of a biosensor for cholesterol detection. By separating the anode and cathode ECL signals, false positive signals can be significantly reduced, demonstrating excellent analytical performance with remarkable sensitivity and potential for enzymatic biosensing applications.
Simultaneous anodic and cathodic electrochemiluminescence (ECL) emissions of black phosphorus nanosheets (BPNSs) and graphitic carbon nitrides (g-C3N4) were reported based on the co-existence of different co-reactants. Anodic ECL was obtained at the BPNSs modified electrode with tripropylamine (TPrA) as a co-reactant, while g-C3N4 was selected as another emitter to obtain cathodic ECL emission with K2S2O8 as co-reactant. Employing the superiority of two separate ECL systems, a facile ECL method was developed for cholesterol detection based on cholesterol oxidase (ChOx) immobilized g-C(3)N(4/)BPNSs modified glassy carbon electrode (g-C(3)N(4/)BPNSs/GCE). False positive signals can be significantly reduced based on the separation of anode and cathode ECL signals from BPNSs and g-C3N4, respectively. The proposed biosensor provided a quantitative readout proportional to cholesterol concentrations in the range from 0.5 mu M to 0.5 mM with a detection limit of 0.14 mu M (cathodic system, 3 sigma, n = 6) and 0.32 mu M (anodic system, 3 sigma, n = 6). The proposed biosensor demonstrated excellent analytical performance with remarkable sensitivity, manifesting its potential application in enzymatic biosensing field.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据