4.6 Article

Reconnection-driven Particle Acceleration in Relativistic Shear Flows

期刊

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL LETTERS
卷 907, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.3847/2041-8213/abd9bc

关键词

Relativistic jets; Plasma astrophysics; Non-thermal radiation sources; High energy astrophysics

资金

  1. NASA via the TCAN award grant [NNX14AB47G]
  2. black hole initiative at Harvard University - Templeton Foundation
  3. Sloan Fellowship
  4. Cottrell Scholar Award
  5. NASA [ATP NNX17AG21G]
  6. NSF [PHY-1903412]
  7. DoE [DE-SC0021254]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Investigating particle energization in shear flows, we found that Kelvin-Helmholtz instabilities in their nonlinear stages generate kinetic-scale reconnection layers that efficiently energize jet particles, providing a first-principles mechanism for particle injection into shear-driven acceleration. Our work supports spine-sheath models of jet emission and explains the origin of radio-emitting electrons at the boundaries of relativistic jets.
Particle energization in shear flows is invoked to explain nonthermal emission from the boundaries of relativistic astrophysical jets. Yet the physics of particle injection, i.e., the mechanism that allows thermal particles to participate in shear-driven acceleration, remains unknown. With particle-in-cell simulations, we study the development of Kelvin-Helmholtz (KH) instabilities seeded by the velocity shear between a relativistic magnetically dominated electron-positron jet and a weakly magnetized electron-ion ambient plasma. We show that, in their nonlinear stages, KH vortices generate kinetic-scale reconnection layers, which efficiently energize the jet particles, thus providing a first-principles mechanism for particle injection into shear-driven acceleration. Our work lends support to spine-sheath models of jet emission-with a fast core/spine surrounded by a slower sheath-and can explain the origin of radio-emitting electrons at the boundaries of relativistic jets.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据