4.7 Article

Within-Trial Cost-Effectiveness of a Structured Lifestyle Intervention in Adults With Overweight/Obesity and Type 2 Diabetes: Results From the Action for Health in Diabetes (Look AHEAD) Study

期刊

DIABETES CARE
卷 44, 期 1, 页码 67-74

出版社

AMER DIABETES ASSOC
DOI: 10.2337/dc20-0358

关键词

-

资金

  1. Department of Health and Human Services
  2. National Institutes of Health (NIH) [DK57136, DK57149, DK56990, DK57177, DK57171, DK57151, DK57182, DK57131, DK57002, DK57078, DK57154, DK57178, DK57219, DK57008, DK57135, DK56992]
  3. Intramural Research Program of the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases
  4. Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions Bayview Clinical Research Unit [M01RR02719]
  5. Massachusetts General Hospital Mallinckrodt Clinical Research Center
  6. Massachusetts Institute of Technology General Clinical Research Center [M01RR01066]
  7. University of Colorado Health Sciences Center General Clinical Research Center [M01RR00051]
  8. Clinical Nutrition Research Unit [P30 DK48520]
  9. University of Tennessee Clinical Research Center [M01RR0021140]
  10. University of Pittsburgh General Clinical Research Center [M01RR000056]
  11. Clinical Translational Research Center - Clinical and Translational Science Award [UL1 RR 024153]
  12. NIH grant [DK046204]
  13. VA Puget Sound Health Care System Medical Research Service, Department of Veterans Affairs
  14. Frederic C. Bartter-General Clinical Research Center [M01RR01346]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The cost-effectiveness of an intensive lifestyle intervention (ILI) compared with standard diabetes support and education (DSE) over 9 years was unclear, as different health utility measures led to different conclusions regarding the additional quality-adjusted life years gained by ILI.
OBJECTIVE To assess the cost-effectiveness (CE) of an intensive lifestyle intervention (ILI) compared with standard diabetes support and education (DSE) in adults with overweight/obesity and type 2 diabetes, as implemented in the Action for Health in Diabetes study. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS Data were from 4,827 participants during their first 9 years of study participation from 2001 to 2012. Information on Health Utilities Index Mark 2 (HUI-2) and HUI-3, Short-Form 6D (SF-6D), and Feeling Thermometer (FT), cost of delivering the interventions, and health expenditures was collected during the study. CE was measured by incremental CE ratios (ICERs) in costs per quality-adjusted life year (QALY). Future costs and QALYs were discounted at 3% annually. Costs were in 2012 U.S. dollars. RESULTS Over the 9 years studied, the mean cumulative intervention costs and mean cumulative health care expenditures were $11,275 and $64,453 per person for ILI and $887 and $68,174 for DSE. Thus, ILI cost $6,666 more per person than DSE. Additional QALYs gained by ILI were not statistically significant measured by the HUIs and were 0.07 and 0.15, respectively, measured by SF-6D and FT. The ICERs ranged from no health benefit with a higher cost based on HUIs to $96,458/QALY and $43,169/QALY, respectively, based on SF-6D and FT. CONCLUSIONS Whether ILI was cost-effective over the 9-year period is unclear because different health utility measures led to different conclusions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据