4.7 Article

Paracrine Factors Secreted by MSCs Promote Astrocyte Survival Associated With GFAP Downregulation After Ischemic Stroke via p38 MAPK and JNK

期刊

JOURNAL OF CELLULAR PHYSIOLOGY
卷 230, 期 10, 页码 2461-2475

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jcp.24981

关键词

-

资金

  1. funds for National Key Clinic Department
  2. Natural Science Fund of China [81171179, 81272439]
  3. Funds for Key Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong [S2013020012754]
  4. Educational Commission of Guangdong [2013CXZDA008]
  5. Key Project of Health Collaborative Innovation of Guangzhou [201400000003-2]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Astrocytes are critical for ischemic stroke, and understanding their role in mesenchymal stem cell (MSC)-mediated protection against ischemic injury is important. The paracrine capacity of MSCs has been proposed as the principal mechanism contributing to the protection and repair of brain tissue. In the present study, an in vitro oxygen-glucose deprivation (OGD) model was used to mimic ischemic injury. OGD-induced astrocytes were reperfused with MSC-conditioned medium (MSC-CM) or co-cultured with MSCs for 24 h to create an environment abundant in paracrine factors. The results indicated that both situations could protect astrocytes from apoptosis, increase cell metabolic activity, and reduce glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) overexpression; however, the effects of co-culturing with MSCs were more positive. Paracrine factors suppressed the activation of p38 MAPK, JNK, and their downstream targets p53 and STAT1. Inhibition of p38 MAPK, JNK, p53, and STAT1 attenuated astrocyte injury and/or GFAP upregulation. Activation of p38 MAPK and JNK suppressed the beneficial effects of paracrine factors, resulting in decreased survival and GFAP overexpression. These results suggest that paracrine factors inhibit p38 MAPK and JNK, and most likely by regulating their downstream targets, p53 and STAT1, to promote astrocyte survival associated with GFAP downregulation after ischemic stroke in vitro. (C) 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据