4.6 Review

High-throughput screening of ternary vanadate photoanodes for efficient oxygen evolution reactions: A review of band-gap engineering

期刊

APPLIED CATALYSIS A-GENERAL
卷 616, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.apcata.2021.118073

关键词

High-throughput; Ternary vanadate; Oxygen evolution reaction; Band-gap engineering; Photoanode

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2017YFB0702802]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The development of narrow-band-gap photoanodes is crucial for efficient water-splitting oxygen evolution reactions. Manipulation of crystal and electronic structures, as well as composition-dependent properties, are extensively researched to develop effective water splitting technologies. High-throughput techniques are proposed as potential rapid approaches to explore the composition-structure-performance relationship in ternary vanadates.
The development of narrow-band-gap photoanodes is a major challenge in the quest for efficient water-splitting oxygen evolution reactions. The monoclinic scheelite BiVO4 makes ternary vanadates increasingly attractive by highlighting their intriguing characteristics. Manipulation of crystal and electronic structures, as well as composition-dependent properties, are researched extensively in order to develop effective water splitting technologies. Exploration of the composition-structure-performance relationship is of great significance but requires a heavy workload. Thus, high-throughput techniques attract attention as potential rapid approaches to such exploration. Here, we summarize state-of-the-art screening of ternary vanadates over broad compositional gradient ranges via high-throughput techniques. The relationship between composition and photo-electrochemical performance is also highlighted. We then consider challenges and perspectives for the rational design of advanced ternary vanadates designed for the water-splitting oxygen evolution reaction and propose implementation of high-throughput techniques to expedite such development.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据