4.7 Article

MicroRNA-370 carried by M2 macrophage-derived exosomes alleviates asthma progression through inhibiting the FGF1/MAPK/STAT1 axis

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES
卷 17, 期 7, 页码 1795-1807

出版社

IVYSPRING INT PUBL
DOI: 10.7150/ijbs.59715

关键词

M2 macrophages; exosomes; miR-370; FGF1; asthma

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study revealed that M2 macrophagederived exosomes can alleviate asthma progression by downregulating FGF1 expression and the MAPK/STAT1 signaling pathway through carrying miR-370. This mechanism provides a new perspective for asthma treatment.
Emerging evidence has suggested the functions of exosomes in allergic diseases including asthma. By using a mouse model with asthma induced by ovalbumin (OVA), we explored the roles of M2 macrophagederived exosomes (M20-Exos) in asthma progression. M20-Exos significantly alleviated OVA-induced fibrosis and inflammatory responses in mouse lung tissues, as well as inhibited abnormal proliferation, invasion, and fibrosis-related protein production in platelet derived growth factor (PDGF-BB) treated primary mouse airway smooth muscle cells (ASMCs). The OVA administration in mice or the PDGF-BB treatment in ASMCs reduced the expression of miR-370, which was detected in M20-Exos by miRNA sequencing. However, treating the mice or ASMCs with M20-Exos reversed the inhibitory effect of OVA or PDGF-BB on miR-370 expression. We identified that the target of miR-370 was fibroblast growth factor 1 (FGF1). Downregulation of miR-370 by Lv-miR-370 inhibitor or overexpression of FGF1 by Lv-FGF1 blocked the protective roles of M20-Exos in asthma-like mouse and cell models. M20-Exos were found to inactivate the MAPK signaling pathway, which was recovered by miR-370 inhibition or FGF1 overexpression. Collectively, we conclude that M20-Exos carry miR-370 to alleviate asthma progression through downregulating FGF1 expression and the MAPK/STAT1 signaling pathway. Our study may offer a novel insight into asthma treatment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据