4.7 Article

A Probabilistic Interpretation of Self-Paced Learning with Applications to Reinforcement Learning

期刊

出版社

MICROTOME PUBL

关键词

curriculum learning; reinforcement learning; self-paced learning; tempered inference; rl-as-inference

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study introduces an automated curriculum generation method in reinforcement learning, formalizing the self-paced learning paradigm as inducing a distribution over training tasks to balance task complexity and the goal of matching a desired task distribution. Experiment results demonstrate that training on this induced distribution can help avoid poor local optima in different RL algorithms across tasks with uninformative rewards and challenging exploration requirements.
Across machine learning, the use of curricula has shown strong empirical potential to improve learning from data by avoiding local optima of training objectives. For reinforcement learning (RL), curricula are especially interesting, as the underlying optimization has a strong tendency to get stuck in local optima due to the exploration-exploitation trade-off. Recently, a number of approaches for an automatic generation of curricula for RL have been shown to increase performance while requiring less expert knowledge compared to manually designed curricula. However, these approaches are seldomly investigated from a theoretical perspective, preventing a deeper understanding of their mechanics. In this paper, we present an approach for automated curriculum generation in RL with a clear theoretical underpinning. More precisely, we formalize the well-known self-paced learning paradigm as inducing a distribution over training tasks, which trades off between task complexity and the objective to match a desired task distribution. Experiments show that training on this induced distribution helps to avoid poor local optima across RL algorithms in different tasks with uninformative rewards and challenging exploration requirements.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据