3.8 Review

A recently explored aspect of the iceberg named COVID-19: multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C)

期刊

TURKISH ARCHIVES OF PEDIATRICS
卷 56, 期 1, 页码 3-9

出版社

AVES
DOI: 10.5152/TurkArchPediatr.2020.20245

关键词

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); hyperinflammatory syndrome; toxic shock syndrome; Kawasaki disease; multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C); pediatric inflammatory multisystem syndrome temporally associated with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection (PIMS-TS); pediatrics; severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A new disease called multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children has emerged in the era of 2019 coronavirus disease, which, although rare, appears to be highly fatal. Understanding the pathogenesis and establishing appropriate treatment regimes are urgent needs.
Humanity has recently gained a novel foe named coronavirus disease 2019. Although data so far mostly suggest that children are more likely to have a favorable disease course, new concerns have been raised because of recently reported pediatric cases with hyperinflammatory conditions resembling Kawasaki disease, toxic shock syndrome, and macrophage activation syndrome/hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis. Because the increasing evidence suggests that this recent hyperinflammatory condition emerged in the coronavirus disease 2019 era is a distinct clinical picture, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention named this novel disease multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children. Even if this novel disease is rare, it seems to be highly fatal. Therefore, it is urgent to understand the pathogenesis of the disease to be able to establish the appropriate treatment regimes. Concerns regarding the diagnostic process and the management of the disease have been raised even among pediatricians. Therefore, we aimed to clarify this newly occurring enigma based on the current literature and our clinical insights.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据