4.3 Article

Writing motivation: A validation study of self-judgment and performance

期刊

ASSESSING WRITING
卷 48, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.asw.2020.100509

关键词

Writing assessment; Writing motivation; Academic performance; Automated writing evaluation (AWE)

资金

  1. Institute of Education Science, U.S. Department of Education [R305A160115]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study validated a writing motivation survey and examined the relationship between students' writing motivation and academic performance indicators. Results showed a unidimensional structure for confidence and affect, a 3-factor structure for goals, and a 2-factor structure for beliefs. Low but significant correlations were found between motivation and outcome performance measures, as well as between motivation and features of student writing.
This study reports on validation of a writing motivation survey and its relationship with a variety of indicators of academic performance of 566 undergraduate students drawn from six US postsecondary institutions. A writing motivation survey was used to capture students? writing goals, confidence, beliefs, and affect. Two research questions are addressed in the study: 1) What is the internal factor structure of the writing motivation survey completed by a broad range of college students? (2) Using this factor structure, how are the subconstructs of writing motivation associated with the outcomes variables of student performance and features of student writing? Our results confirmed a unidimensional structure for confidence and affect, a 3-factor structure for goals, and a 2-factor structure for beliefs. Low level but significant correlations were also identified between motivation and outcome performance measures, as well as between motivation and features of student writing. The study findings yield insights about the relationship between students? writing motivation, college success indicators, and writing domain knowledge. These findings suggest directions for pedagogical interventions targeting both motivation and writing feature use.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据