4.7 Article

Epigenetic profiling of the antitumor natural product psammaplin A and its analogues

期刊

BIOORGANIC & MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY
卷 19, 期 12, 页码 3637-3649

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.bmc.2010.12.026

关键词

Psammaplin A; Epigenetics; HDAC; DNMT; Total synthesis; Natural products

资金

  1. EU [Epitron LSHC-CT2005-518417]
  2. ATLAS [221952]
  3. Spanish MICINN [SAF-07-63880-FEDER]
  4. Xunta de Galicia (INBIOMED)
  5. Italian Associazione Italiana per la ricerca contro il cancro
  6. Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro Funding Source: Custom

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A collection of analogues of the dimeric natural product psammaplin A that differ in the substitution on the ( halo) tyrosine aryl ring, the oxime and the diamine connection has been synthesized. The effects on cell cycle, induction of differentiation and apoptosis of the natural-product inspired series were measured on the human leukaemia U937 cell line. Epigenetic profiling included induction of p21(WAF1), effects on global H3 histone and tubulin acetylation levels as well as in vitro enzymatic assays using HDAC1, DNMT1, DNMT3A, SIRT1 and a peptide domain with p300/CBP HAT activity. Whereas the derivatives of psammaplin A with modifications in the length of the connecting chain, the oxime bond and the disulfide unit showed lower potency, the analogues with changes on the bromotyrosine ring exhibited activities comparable to those of the parent compound in the inhibition of HDAC1 and in the induction of apoptosis. The lack of HDAC1 activity of analogues modified on the disulfide bond suggests that its cleavage must occur in cells to produce the monomeric Zn2+-chelating thiol. This assumption is consistent with the molecular modelling of the complex of psammaplin A thiol with h-HDAC8. Only a weak inhibition of DNMT1, DNMT3A and residual activities with SIRT1 and a p300/CBP HAT peptide were measured for these compounds. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据