4.3 Article

Role of QseG membrane protein in beneficial enterobacterial interactions with plants and Mesorhizobia

期刊

JOURNAL OF PLANT INTERACTIONS
卷 16, 期 1, 页码 510-521

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/17429145.2021.2000050

关键词

Plant defence response; bacterial infection ability; plant growth-promoting bacteria; Cicer arietinum L; symbiosis; bacterial endophytes

资金

  1. FEDER funds through the COMPETE 2020 (POCI)
  2. FCT [POCI-010145-FEDER-016810 (PTDC/AGR-PRO/2978/2014), SFRH/BPD/94751/2013, CEECIND/00093/2018]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The QseG protein plays a key role in evading the plant immune system and efficiently colonizing chickpea root cells, which are essential for the beneficial effects on the Mesorhizobium-chickpea symbiosis. This study demonstrates that the role of QseG is common across pathogenic and non-pathogenic enterobacteria, advancing our understanding of the molecular basis of plant-bacteria interactions in legume and beneficial endophytic enterobacteria.
Homologs of qseG gene (coding for the membrane protein QseG), along with the qseEF genes, are present in many Enterobacteriaceae; however, its role in non-pathogenic strains is still unknown. To fill this knowledge gap, we investigated the role of QseG protein of a plant-associated enterobacterium in the interactions with its legume host and in the benefits induced by this enterobacterium in the Mesorhizobium-chickpea symbiosis. Here, we showed that QseG of Kosakonia sp. MH5 is involved in the following processes: (i) the evasion of the plant immune system and (ii) the efficient colonization of chickpea root cells. Furthermore, these features are essential for the beneficial effects of this strain on the Mesorhizobium-chickpea symbiosis. This study demonstrates that the role of QseG is transversal to pathogenic and non-pathogenic enterobacteria and is a step forward to better understanding the molecular bases of plant-bacteria interactions established between legume and beneficial endophytic enterobacteria.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据