4.7 Article

New hydroxystilbenoid derivatives endowed with neuroprotective activity and devoid of interference with estrogen and aryl hydrocarbon receptor-mediated transcription

期刊

BIOORGANIC & MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY
卷 19, 期 1, 页码 339-351

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.bmc.2010.11.018

关键词

Stilbenoid derivatives; Oxidative stress; Neuronal damage; Estrogen receptor; Arylhydrocarbon receptor

资金

  1. EU [MEST-CT-2005-020575]
  2. Competitiveness-Research Network PENED [03Edelta644]
  3. General Secretariat for Research and Technology

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We have synthesized a series of new (E) stilbenoid derivatives containing hydroxy groups at ring positions identical or similar to those of trans-resveratrol and bearing one or two bulky electron donating groups ortho to 4'-OH and we have evaluated their neuroprotective activity using glutamate-challenged HT22 hippocampal neurons to model oxidative stress-induced neuronal cell death. The most active derivatives, 5-{(E)-2-[3,5-bis(1-ethylpropyl)-4-hydroxyphenyl]ethenyl}-1,3-benzenediol (2), 5-[(E)-2-(3,5-di-tert-butyl-4-hydroxyphenylethenyl)]-1,3-benzenediol (4) and 5-{(1E, 3E)-4-[3,5-bis(1-ethylpropyl)-4-hydroxyphenyl]-1,3-butadienyl}-1,3-benzenediol (6), had EC50 values of 30, 45 and 12 nM, respectively, and were ca. 100 to 400-fold more potent than resveratrol. Derivatives 2, 4 and 6 lacked cytotoxic activity against HT22 cells and estrogen receptor agonist or antagonist activity in estrogen response element-dependent gene expression and in estrogen-dependent proliferation of MCF-7 human breast cancer cells. In addition, they were incapable of interfering with aryl hydrocarbon receptor-mediated xenobiotic response element-dependent gene expression. Derivatives 2, 4 and 6 might assist in the development of lead candidates against oxidative stress-driven neurodegenerative diseases that will not increase endocrine cancer risk nor affect drug activation and detoxification mechanisms. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据