4.7 Article

Engineered Thermoplasma acidophilum factor F3 mimics human aminopeptidase N (APN) as a target for anticancer drug development

期刊

BIOORGANIC & MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY
卷 19, 期 9, 页码 2991-2996

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.bmc.2011.03.028

关键词

Aminopeptidase N; Inhibitors; Tricorn interacting factor F3; Crystal structure; Drug design

资金

  1. State Key Laboratory of Microbial Technology
  2. Shandong University
  3. Hi-Tech Research and Development Program of China [2006AA02A324]
  4. National Nature Science Foundation of China [30772654, 90713041]
  5. National High Technology Research and Development Program of China (863 project) [2007AA02Z314]
  6. special fund for Basic Scientific Research of Central Colleges, South-Central University for Nationalities [ZZQ10013]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Human aminopeptidase N (hAPN) is an appealing objective for the development of anti-cancer agents. The absence of mammalian APN experimental structure negatively impinges upon the progression of structure-based drug design. Tricorn interacting factor F3 (factor F3) from Thermoplasma acidophilum shares 33% sequence identity with hAPN. Engineered factor F3 with two point directed mutations resulted in a protein with an active site identical to hAPN. In the present work, the engineered factor F3 has been co-crystallized with compound D24, a potent APN inhibitor introduced by our lab. Such a holo-form experimental structure helpfully insinuates a more bulky pocket than Bestatin-bound Escherichia coli APN. This evidence discloses that compound D24 targetting the structure of E. coli APN cannot bind to the activity cleft of factor F3 with high affinity. Thus, there is a potential risk of inefficiency to design hAPN targeting drug while using E. coli APN as the target model. We do propose here now that engineered factor F3 can be employed as a reasonable alternative of hAPN for drug design and development. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据