4.7 Article

A Pre-explosion Extended Effervescent Zone around Core-collapse Supernova Progenitors

期刊

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
卷 906, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/abca8f

关键词

Stellar mass loss; Type II supernovae

资金

  1. Israel Science Foundation [420/16, 769/20]
  2. Asher Space Research Fund at the Technion

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The author proposes a new model to explain the collision of the ejecta of many core-collapse supernovae with dense compact circumstellar matter days after explosion, and discusses the various effects that this model may produce.
I propose a scenario according to which the dense compact circumstellar matter (CSM) that the ejecta of many core-collapse supernovae (CCSNe) collide with within several days after explosion results from a dense zone where in addition to the stellar wind there is gas that does not reach the escape velocity. In this effervescent zone around red supergiant (RSG) stars, there are dense clumps that are ejected from the vicinity of the RSG surface, rise to radii of tens of astronomical units, and then fall back. I consider two simple velocity distributions of the ejected clumps. I find that the density of the bound mass can be tens of times that of the escaping wind, and therefore can mimic a very high mass-loss rate. The dense effervescent compact CSM zone can (1) explain the collision of the ejecta of many CCSNe with a dense compact CSM days after explosion, (2) facilitate very high mass-loss rate if the star experiences powerful pre-explosion activity, (3) form dust that obscures the progenitor in the visible band, and (4) lead to an efficient mass transfer to a stellar companion at separations of tens of astronomical units, if it exists. The effervescent zone might exist for thousands of years and more, and therefore the effervescent CSM model removes the requirement from many type II CCSN progenitors to experience a very strong outburst just years to months before explosion.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据