4.7 Article

Numerical analysis of the wake dynamics of a propeller

期刊

PHYSICS OF FLUIDS
卷 33, 期 9, 页码 -

出版社

AIP Publishing
DOI: 10.1063/5.0064100

关键词

-

资金

  1. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2682021CX080, 2021qntd04]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [52101374, 52101380, 11772273]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province [2021A1515012134]
  4. Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation [2019A1515110721]
  5. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2019M663243]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates the inception mechanism of propeller wake instability and finds that the instability is caused by interactions among vortex structures behind the propeller and the high-speed shear layer, with azimuthal velocity diffusion playing an important role in the mutual induction process. A model is proposed that can predict the time and location of vortex pairing.
This paper investigates the inception mechanism of propeller wake instability based on an improved detached eddy simulation method at a moderate advance coefficient of 1-0.65. Computational fluid dynamics simulations involving a rotating propeller using a dynamic overset technique are performed at 1-0.38 and 1-0.88 to validate the numerical approach, and these results are compared against experimental data of thrust and torque coefficients and phase-averaged axial velocity from the literature. The results indicate that propeller wake instability results from interactions among vortex structures behind the propeller and the high-speed shear layer. In addition, the diffusion of azimuthal velocity plays an important role in the mutual induction process. Finally, we propose a model that includes the main physical processes leading to tip vortex instability and can predict the time and location of vortex pairing. The present study provides deeper insight into the flow physics driving the tip vortex pairing process. Published under an exclusive license by AIP Publishing:

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据