4.7 Article

Synthesis, X-ray crystal structure study and antitumoral evaluations of 5,6-disubstituted pyrimidine derivatives

期刊

BIOORGANIC & MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY
卷 18, 期 7, 页码 2704-2712

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.bmc.2010.02.023

关键词

5,6-Disubstituted pyrimidines; Lithiation; Positron-emission tomography (PET); Cytostatic evaluations; X-ray diffraction; Hydrogen bonds; pi center dot center dot center dot pi interactions

资金

  1. Ministry of Science of the Republic of Croatia [125-0982464-2925, 119-1193079-3069, 098-0982464-2514]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

5,6-Disubstituted pyrimidine derivatives (3-20) were prepared by intramolecular cyclization reaction of alpha-(1-carbamyliminomethylene)-gamma-butyrolactone (2) with sodium ethoxide and subsequent chemical transformation of 2-hydroxy group in C-5 side chain as well as lithiation reaction for introduction of acyclic side chain at C-6. All compounds were characterized by H-1 NMR, C-13 NMR and mass spectra. Structures of compounds 4, 7 and 14 were unambiguously confirmed by X-ray crystal structural analysis. Supramolecular structures of these three compounds differ significantly. Two N-H center dot center dot center dot O and one C-H center dot center dot center dot O hydrogen bonds in 4 form three-dimensional network. One O-H center dot center dot center dot N hydrogen bond and one pi center dot center dot center dot pi interaction self-assemble the molecules of 7 into sheets. In supramolecular aggregation of 14, only pi center dot center dot center dot pi stacking interactions participate, so forming chains. The compounds were evaluated for their cytostatic activities against human malignant cell lines. Of all tested compounds, 2,4-dimethoxy-5-methoxy-tritylethylpyrimidine (9) and 2,4-dichloro-5-chloroethylpyrimidine (14) exhibited the most prominent inhibitory effects. Furthermore, compound 14 showed marked activity against human colon carcinoma (IC50 = 0.4 mu M). (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据