4.7 Article

RetinaNet With Difference Channel Attention and Adaptively Spatial Feature Fusion for Steel Surface Defect Detection

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TIM.2020.3040485

关键词

Anchor optimization; deep neural network (DNN); defect detection; feature fusion; product surface defect

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [71777173]
  2. Action Plan for Scientific and Technological Innovation of Shanghai Science and Technology Commission [19511106303]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study introduces a new deep neural network model, DEA_RetinaNet, for steel surface defect detection, which utilizes methods like differential evolution search-based anchor optimization and channel attention mechanism to improve detection accuracy and achieve better recognition performance.
Surface defect detection of products is an important process to guarantee the quality of industrial production. A defect detection task aims to identify the specific category and precise position of defect in an image. It is hard to take into account the accuracy of both, which makes it be challenging in practice. In this study, a new deep neural network (DNN), RetinaNet with difference channel attention and adaptively spatial feature fusion (DEA_RetinaNet), is proposed for steel surface defect detection. First, a differential evolution search-based anchor optimization is performed to improve the detection accuracy of DEA_RetinaNet. Second, a novel channel attention mechanism is embedded in DEA_RetinaNet to reduce information loss. Finally, the adaptive spatial feature fusion (ASFF) module is used for an effective fusion of shallow and deep features extracted by convolutional kernels. The experimental results on a steel surface defect data set (NEU-DET) show that DEA_RetinaNet achieved 78.25 mAP and improved by 2.92% over RetinaNet. It has better recognition performance compared with other famous DNN-based detectors.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据