4.8 Article

Rank-in: enabling integrative analysis across microarray and RNA-seq for cancer

期刊

NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH
卷 49, 期 17, 页码 -

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkab554

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2017YFC1700200, 2019YFA0905900, 2017YFC0908405]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [32070657, 81830080]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Rank-In is a method that corrects nonbiological effects in mixed microarray and RNA-seq data for integrated analysis. It has been validated to accurately classify samples and achieve high accuracy in predicting differentially expressed genes.
Though transcriptomics technologies evolve rapidly in the past decades, integrative analysis of mixed data between microarray and RNA-seq remains challenging due to the inherent variability difference between them. Here, Rank-In was proposed to correct the nonbiological effects across the two technologies, enabling freely blended data for consolidated analysis. Rank-In was rigorously validated via the public cell and tissue samples tested by both technologies. On the two reference samples of the SEQC project, Rank-In not only perfectly classified the 44 profiles but also achieved the best accuracy of 0.9 on predicting TaqMan-validated DEGs. More importantly, on 327 Glioblastoma (GBM) profiles and 248, 523 heterogeneous colon cancer profiles respectively, only Rank-In can successfully discriminate every single cancer profile from normal controls, while the others cannot. Further on different sizes of mixed seq-array GBM profiles, Rank-In can robustly reproduce a median range of DEG overlapping from 0.74 to 0.83 among top genes, whereas the others never exceed 0.72. Being the first effective method enabling mixed data of cross-technology analysis, Rank-In welcomes hybrid of array and seq profiles for integrative study on large/small, paired/unpaired and balanced/imbalanced samples, opening possibility to reduce sampling space of clinical cancer patients. Rank-In can be accessed at http://www.baddcao.net/rank-in/index.html.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据